All use cases

Reconcile a bank statement against 1C entries

The statement and 1C are forty thousand apart, and nobody knows where. The agent matches operations line by line and names every mismatch.

Medium · 20 min · once a month

What you get

412 of 418 operations matched. Six did not:
14.03  Supplier A       120,000  in bank, not in 1C
16.03  Romashka LLC      45,000  in 1C, not in bank
21.03  Supplier B        18,500  amounts differ by 500
Total discrepancy: 143,500 ₽.
Two more rows matched on amount alone — number and
date disagree, look at those first.

A sample on made-up data — your numbers will be your own.

Who it fits

  • Month-end close, when the bank balance and the 1C balance disagree and you need the exact rows.
  • Several current accounts and a steady flow of small payments — impossible to check by eye.

When it won't work

The period's postings haven't been entered yet — there is nothing to reconcile against.

How the agent does it

1

Open up access

The agent reads the statement and the postings directly, nothing to export. Just tell it the period and which accounts are in scope.

2

Run the reconciliation

Operations are matched on three attributes at once: amount, date and payee. An amount-only match does not count as a match.

3

Work through the gaps

Before you hand the list to the accountant, ask the agent to review itself: some gaps are a shifted payment date rather than a real error.

What you set

You'll need 1C and the bank: Tochka or a statement in 1C format. From you: the period and the list of accounts, if there are several.

What you'll need

Точка

Starter prompt

Copy the prompt or open it straight in a chat with the agent.

Prompt for the agent

Reconcile the bank statement [Tochka / Alfa / Sber — or the attached file] against the postings in 1C for [period]. Match operations by amount, date and payee. Collect separately: receipts and payments not posted in 1C, postings with no bank operation, amount discrepancies within a single operation, likely duplicates. Don't force pairs: if an operation matched only by amount but not by payee or date — put it in "needs a decision", not in the matches. Output an XLSX: a "Discrepancies" sheet linking to the operation number and source document, a "Matched" sheet and a total line — how many operations and what amount did not reconcile.

Open in chat
Check the result

Review your reconciliation. List: — operations matched on fewer than all three attributes; — discrepancies explained by a shifted payment date rather than an error; — payees that have several similarly named records in 1C; — rows where the payee was inferred from the payment description rather than from the bank details; — the total discrepancy amount and which rows make it up. Don't fix anything silently: whatever you can correct yourself, show as a "proposed changes" list.

A second prompt — the agent uses it to review its own work and show what's left for you.

Related use cases